<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.1" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The easy way to get Michael Arrington and John Chow to link to your blog</title>
	<link>http://www.upstartblogger.com/the-easy-way-to-get-michael-arrington-and-john-chow-to-link-to-your-blog</link>
	<description>Successful Blogging Made Simple</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 01:53:16 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: yeu2</title>
		<link>http://www.upstartblogger.com/the-easy-way-to-get-michael-arrington-and-john-chow-to-link-to-your-blog#comment-14091</link>
		<dc:creator>yeu2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 19:05:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.upstartblogger.com/the-easy-way-to-get-michael-arrington-and-john-chow-to-link-to-your-blog#comment-14091</guid>
		<description>I agree trackbacks can be a great asset to building hits to your blogs. I have been reading that more and more blogs are turning them off due to spammers, etc. Does this resonate with anyone?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree trackbacks can be a great asset to building hits to your blogs. I have been reading that more and more blogs are turning them off due to spammers, etc. Does this resonate with anyone?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ashley Morgan</title>
		<link>http://www.upstartblogger.com/the-easy-way-to-get-michael-arrington-and-john-chow-to-link-to-your-blog#comment-14089</link>
		<dc:creator>Ashley Morgan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 16:40:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.upstartblogger.com/the-easy-way-to-get-michael-arrington-and-john-chow-to-link-to-your-blog#comment-14089</guid>
		<description>Joshua - Yes, you're right, it's not perfect.  But not all the readers of those blogs are idiots.  Many go there via search engines and may well be crying out for an exit route.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joshua - Yes, you&#8217;re right, it&#8217;s not perfect.  But not all the readers of those blogs are idiots.  Many go there via search engines and may well be crying out for an exit route.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joshua Goodwin</title>
		<link>http://www.upstartblogger.com/the-easy-way-to-get-michael-arrington-and-john-chow-to-link-to-your-blog#comment-14087</link>
		<dc:creator>Joshua Goodwin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 16:30:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.upstartblogger.com/the-easy-way-to-get-michael-arrington-and-john-chow-to-link-to-your-blog#comment-14087</guid>
		<description>It's not necessarily brilliant. For starters, the idiotic readers of some such blogs aren't always going to find your website interesting, if you have a blog that's any good. And even if it's not identified as spam, the authors may well press "delete".

Also, I belive the links in comments and track/pingbacks are nearly always &lt;code&gt;rel="nofollow"&lt;/code&gt; and so will not contribute to your search engine placement - something which will irritate SEO lovers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s not necessarily brilliant. For starters, the idiotic readers of some such blogs aren&#8217;t always going to find your website interesting, if you have a blog that&#8217;s any good. And even if it&#8217;s not identified as spam, the authors may well press &#8220;delete&#8221;.</p>
<p>Also, I belive the links in comments and track/pingbacks are nearly always <code>rel="nofollow"</code> and so will not contribute to your search engine placement - something which will irritate SEO lovers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
