It’s long been Apple’s attitude, some might say its raison d’etre, to lead rather than to follow. And the iPad will lead the way and be the first step in a massive move away from the traditional computer and, perhaps more importantly, the traditional internet.
Currently the traditional internet is accessed via a traditional computer, laptop or desktop, using a traditional keyboard. Sure, there are exceptions to this rule but just as I am typing this on an Apple iMac, I am certain, having checked my stats, that around 95% of you are reading it sitting in front of something with a keyboard. And that setup governs how everyone uses the internet.
How popular would Google be, for instance, if traditional keyboards didn’t exist? If, as some futurists used to predict, we were all now accessing the internet via flat panels on the front of the refrigerator how much time would be spent typing, let alone typing search queries?
No where near as much. No where near.
I see the iPad as the start of a shift towards task centred computing and task centred internet usage.
Much has been made of the lack of ports on the new Apple iPad. But that is, I think, all part of the strategy.
The same complaints and concerns were heard when the iMac dared to drop the floppy drive. No one seems to worry too much about that anymore, do they?
Apple has always been moving closer and closer to what some people refer to as the cloud. And the iPad will have no problem whatsoever interfacing with your cloud, or the cloud, or a number of clouds, or whatever cloud computing becomes. Indeed, as I said yesterday, I already have an iPad on order simply because it enables me to do something that other devices don’t enable me to do. I will use it to access PDF copies of music, either from it’s own drive or from my cloud. My iPad will replace my traditional scores.
I’ll still keep my original scores. But I won’t use them, not when my iPad arrives. Why would I?
Google should be afraid. In fact, everyone heavily invested in the current traditional internet should be afraid.
If internet usage moves from the traditional computer to a tablet based device what are the implications for blogging? Will people be as eager to comment on blog posts if they have to pull up an overlay keyboard that obscures the screen? Will people change their attitude towards blog advertising as screen real estate becomes increasingly tight? And, with all of this in mind, how will advertisers react when they see that more and more of their advertisements are being served on devices that are not conducive to clicks?
Will bloggers even continue to write as many blogs if the keyboard becomes less and less standard? Furthermore, since it is likely that businesses won’t replace their traditional computers with an Apple iPad but individuals might, could this be the beginning of the end of personal blogging?
The Apple iPad could change everything, perhaps not on it’s own, but it will be a tipping point for a new kind of internet access and internet usage. And making the iPad a closed environment is only a bad thing if you don’t like what is coming down the track.
What do you think?
Will the Apple iPad herald a seismic shift in computer and internet usage? Or am I putting too much faith in Apple’s ability to really change things?
After all, it’s not the like the iPod had any impact on the music industry at all. That was just another flash in the pan device that didn’t change anything at all, wasn’t it?






I agree that apple is a leader – and there are lots of “followers” who grumble and complain etc. I do think the name is a bit unfortunate, but that will blow over in time. Check out this post though for some funny comments on the name – http://www.makefunof.us/2010/01/27/name-fail/
Wow.
He ruffled some feathers…
He retired…
He opened it for a free for all…
He took it back…
He revamped it…
He’s blogging again.
My head’s spinning, but welcome back!
I had sort of been looking out for something between the Kindle and a netbook. It seems that the iPad is the answer. But I don’t think it’ll replace my full PC usage.
Technology has already come a long way yet we’re still using keyboards, and I think that’s for a good reason.
There are just some things that don’t need to be digitalized, in my opinion. For example, my microwave has about 20 buttons and no dial. It’s more advanced in technology, but quite frankly I liked using a dial, it made more sense to me.
I suppose as I write a lot of code I am not quite the average user. I’m also a bit obsessed with keyboard shortcuts. But yeah, the average user is just using the web to get information and services.
Maybe the iPad, and its inevitable competition, will have a bigger impact on web usage than what I believe.
The ipad already has a big enough surface to allow you to type on the “virtual” keyboard with both hands, as can be seen in the conference video when Steve demoes it. Apple also has a “tactile feedback” patent that should make using such a keyboard much easier in future ipads:
http://www.appleinsider.com/articles/09/12/24/possible_apple_tablet_multi_touch_tactile_keyboard_detailed.html
Apple also has a second patent for amongst other things handwriting recognition: http://www.appleinsider.com/articles/09/10/01/evidence_of_apples_tablet_like_input_interface_reappears.html
This would be ideal for the ipad. Too bad none of these technologies appeared in this version.
Are you high?
The keyboard isn’t going anywhere. Whether it’s a piece of hardware or a virtual one on a tablet, there is no better way to interface with the computer.
The internet is quite possible the worlds easiest means of communication, and people aren’t going to stop communication because Jobs & Co didn’t follow the number one rule of business.
Build a product to solve a market need/want, don’t try to build the market for a product.
Pass some of what you’re smoking, because you’ve launched into the stratosphere.
Justin, I’ll quickly respond to you first since I think you have raised a very important issue.
You say there is no better way to interface with a computer than a keyboard.
No doubt your ancestors used to feel that the best way to travel by road was using a horse and cart.
Not many people think that way anymore. Sure, some people prefer to use a horse and cart still but I doubt anyone would agree that it is the best way to travel.
Ashley that same analogy can be used in reverse. Here we have something that is infinitely closed off. No flash. Want to check out espn? Sorry not happening without an app. Hulu? You dream my people.
No multitasking – sweet we have the ultimate calculator – one function at a time folks. Oh and they admitted their touch keyboard sucks by doing the docking station with a keyboard.
This product will be great once it gets to version 2 or 3. But $500 at minimum for this? Nah I’ll pass and wait for them to get their act together.
ok, I can see your point, but I looking at the pad now the main problem I see it that it runs the iphone os… did you see that it doesn’t even play flash? Even in Steve’s demo on the New York Times site it showed the missing plugin!
What about the lack of camera(s). I thought that one of the best uses of this ‘magical’ pad would be skype and other voip apps :-(
last but least battery – Steve is surely kidding telling us that you can watch video for 10 hours on the pad… my latest macbook pro says 7 hours on the box – mmh… maybe in standby…
btw, I love Apple since 1987, have bought almost all their products, i just think this one is surely first generation. I will buy it anyway, because it is cool and I am looking forward to other manufacturers pushing apple to version 2…
cool
Daniel
Hi
I think the future of the iPad and blogging will be secured if the iPad finally allows flash.. Most of my tutorial videos use flowplayer, and it really annoying when people say they can’t access them and why.. because they are trying to view them on an iPhone or iPad.
Andy