<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.1" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Yahoo Mindset: Intent-Driven Search</title>
	<link>http://www.upstartblogger.com/yahoo-mindset-intent-driven-search</link>
	<description>Successful Blogging Made Simple</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 01:50:31 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.upstartblogger.com/yahoo-mindset-intent-driven-search#comment-27</link>
		<dc:creator>anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.upstartblogger.com/yahoo-mindset-intent-driven-search#comment-27</guid>
		<description>Interestingly, I&#8217;ve noticed that if you put the slider&lt;br /&gt;
only SOME of the way toward the &#8220;researching&#8221; end,&lt;br /&gt;
your page stays very high in the rankings (like&lt;br /&gt;
rank 6th when halfway between center and right side). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This seems to suggest that the best results are often&lt;br /&gt;
not at the very extremes.  You want to preserve &lt;br /&gt;
SOME of the original organic rank scoring, so that authoritativeness and other factors are still part of&lt;br /&gt;
the new rank.  That&#8217;s why &#8220;slider&#8221; probably useful.&lt;br /&gt;
I notice that LOTS of results matching your query&lt;br /&gt;
have very long orange bars (very non-commercial), so&lt;br /&gt;
the key to realizing your site should be an especially&lt;br /&gt;
informative AND useful site seems due in large part to its&lt;br /&gt;
authoritativeness (e.g. others pointing to it), not&lt;br /&gt;
just that fact that it, too, isn&#8217;t very commercial.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interestingly, I&#8217;ve noticed that if you put the slider<br />
only SOME of the way toward the &#8220;researching&#8221; end,<br />
your page stays very high in the rankings (like<br />
rank 6th when halfway between center and right side). </p>
<p>This seems to suggest that the best results are often<br />
not at the very extremes.  You want to preserve <br />
SOME of the original organic rank scoring, so that authoritativeness and other factors are still part of<br />
the new rank.  That&#8217;s why &#8220;slider&#8221; probably useful.<br />
I notice that LOTS of results matching your query<br />
have very long orange bars (very non-commercial), so<br />
the key to realizing your site should be an especially<br />
informative AND useful site seems due in large part to its<br />
authoritativeness (e.g. others pointing to it), not<br />
just that fact that it, too, isn&#8217;t very commercial.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Ellis</title>
		<link>http://www.upstartblogger.com/yahoo-mindset-intent-driven-search#comment-28</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Ellis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.upstartblogger.com/yahoo-mindset-intent-driven-search#comment-28</guid>
		<description>You&#8217;re right. If you move the slider slightly to the right, your domain stays pretty high on the list. I&#8217;ve noticed that if I move it all the way to the right, my domain drops off, but the listings are more non-commercial mentions of Futurosity (such as posts I&#8217;ve made to other forums). If I move it to the left, it does pick up the more commercial content (such as mentions of my book). So, actually it does seem to work pretty well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re right. If you move the slider slightly to the right, your domain stays pretty high on the list. I&#8217;ve noticed that if I move it all the way to the right, my domain drops off, but the listings are more non-commercial mentions of Futurosity (such as posts I&#8217;ve made to other forums). If I move it to the left, it does pick up the more commercial content (such as mentions of my book). So, actually it does seem to work pretty well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
